When Israel was created in 1948, there were only 2 places for the
Palestinians to live in : the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. During the creation,
750 000 Palestinians became refugees: some of them were forced to leave Israel,
others were simply scared. Many Arabs believed that all of the Zionists had to
leave Palestine by force. This lead to many attacks against Israelis. At that
time, world opinion was pro-Zionist: there was sympathy towards the Jews after
their extermination by Hitler and many believed that the Arabs' attacks against
Israel was terrorism. Many believed that Arabs were anti-Semitic. As a fact for
those of you who don't know, Arabs themselves are Semitic, according to
anthropologists!! So how can Arabs be anti-Semitic?
In 1967, Israel invaded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. Now there is no
place for the Palestinians to live in. Although some of them were allowed to
remain, many were forced to leave their homes to let space for the Israeli
invaders. The number of homeless Palestinians increased. The refugee camps they
lived in had appalling conditions: they were overcrowded, dirty, small and with
hardly any facilities. The people were hungry and they were all poor. At that
point, more Arabs decided to fight against Israel.
For them, the fight was the fight for freedom. For Israel, the fight was
terrorism. Although Israel refused to obey the UN's rule to leave all occupied
land and allow refugees to return, world opinion was still on Israel's side.
Israel's excuse was that they needed land for security (that's what Hitler said
when he invaded land: he said that their had to be land for the security of the
Germans). Since they had invaded the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, many Israeli
settlements were built. Homes of Palestinians were destroyed without hesitation.
Those who dared to resist were simply killed; or just imprisoned if they were
lucky. Many farms were taken over by the Israelis: the only source of money left
for the Palestinians. Many olive trees, which survived for hundreds, or even
thousands of years, were perished in a few seconds.
The Arabs had nothing to do but to fight. The French fought against the
Nazis. The Polish against the Soviets. The Chinese fought against the Japanese.
Yet, they were all viewed as heroes and freedom-fighters. On the other hand, the
world media always calls the Arabs who fight for freedom terrorists. Why? Is it
because many of their victims are civilians? OK. In 1945, tens of French
civilians who were believed to have supported the Nazis were burnt in the
streets without being trailed. The Russians killed many Nazi civilians in WW2.
Who can now call the French and Russians terrorists, and call the Nazis innocent
victims? The photograph on the left shows a plane hijacked by the
Palestinians.
The Palestinian Liberation Organization had always been fighting against
Israel and many of their attacks were described as "terrorist
attacks". Yet, the crimes committed by the Israeli army, which many of them
were denounced by Human Rights officials in the UN, are never described as
terrorists.
Now, the leader of the PLO, Yasser Arafat is negotiating for peace with
Israel. He used to be known as a terrorist by Israelis. Ariel Sharon, who is
also claiming to search for peace, used to be and still is known, as a butcher.
Arafat wants all the Gaza Strip, the West Bank and all of the Palestinian
refugees (which are now more than 3 million) to return and to form a Palestinian
nation. The Israelis want to give him 90% of the West Bank which is not
occupied by the Israeli settlements (although western media claims that Israelis
want to return 90% of all of the West Bank) and with only some of the
refugees allowed to return. They will only agree to the existence of a disarmed
Palestinian nation.
Many
Israeli political analysts said that Barak's offers during Camp David were the
best ever during the history of the negotiations between Israel and Palestine.
First of all, Barak refused to share Jerusalem with the Palestinians, although
there are many Christian and Islamic sacred sites in the holy city. Also, Barak
said that Arafat could regain the Gaza Strip but without allowing the 3 million
refugees to return. Why should Arafat be blamed for not agreeing to prevent 3
million deprived men, women and children from returning to their homes? Who
could agree to that? And one more thing Barak decided to "compensate"
was 90% of the West Bank. Political analysts tend to forget that 30% of the West
Bank is actually Jerusalem and 25% of it is covered by Jewish settlements: both
which he was not willing to give away. This leaves us with 45% of the West Bank
which Barak was willing to get rid of 90% of it, i.e. 40.5% of all of the West
Bank only!!!
During
and after Camp David, the Palestinians were criticized for not willing to
compensate. The UN gave the Palestinians the right to regain 100% of the Gaza
Strip and the West Bank and under no conditions. Should Palestinians give up
some of this land? Should they give up something which should have belonged to
them? The UN also said that all refugees should have the right to return. Who
should have the right to prevent them from returning? Who should have the right
to keep them poor, deprived and hungry forever?
Yasser Arafat, and many other Arabs, are no longer demanding the return of
all Arab land unconditionally. They have failed to cope with international
pressure and media. The Israelis were, and still are, murderers of hundreds of
Arabs and Muslims. Why should we ask for peaceful co-existence with them? I know
that the Israelis think of the Arabs in the same way because many Israelis were
killed in "terrorist attacks". However, all Israelis came from
different nations from around the world claiming that Palestine belonged to them
and that their race was chosen by God as the best. That's their own belief.
That's their own religion. We should respect it, but they should respect us too.
No matter what you think of Arabs: Arabs are humans just like you!! They have
their own homes. They have their own ambition. Their own dreams. Their own
blood. Their own soul. Why do we give the right for Jews to take the land of
others? The Jews can go back to where they came from. But where can Palestinians
go?
When the Nazis invaded France with the same excuse (they too believed that their
had to be land given to them called Lebensraum or 'living space'), was
their a controversial issue whether they had the right to do that or not, or did
everyone just condemn the Nazis' racist beliefs?